SOLAR MOBILE PROJECT
by Your Name
Course/Code
Professor’s Name
University
City, State
Date
研究essay代写 The energy sector around the world is booming due to the technological advancement in the twentieth century and···
Table of content: 研究essay代写
- Introduction …………………………………………………………………………… 3
1.1 Background Information …………………………………………………………… 3
1.2Scope………………………………………………………………………………… 4
1.3 Problem Definition…………………………………………………………………. 4
- Performance Criteria…………………………………………………………………. 5
2.1 Reliability …………………………………………………………………………… 5
2.2 Longevity …………………………………………………………………………… 6
2.3 Maintenance ………………………………………………………………………… 7
2.4 Sustainability ………………………………………………………………………… 8
2.5 Transport …………………………………………………………………………… 10
2.6 Cost ………………………………………………………………………………… 11
- Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………….. 12
- References …………………………………………………………………………….. 13
Introduction 研究essay代写
1.1 Background Information
The energy sector around the world is booming due to the technological advancement in the twentieth century and the immense energy requirement around the globe. It has led to the need for green sources of energy. Cape York is one of the remotest peninsulas of Australia located in the far north of Queensland region. The Peninsula is suffering from an energy shortfall due to its location (Geoscience Australia and BREE 2014; Sustainability Matters 2018).
Energy requirements in different regions of Cape York vary due to the shifting of population and seasons. Most of the region’s communities are at the national network’s edge, so electricity transfer is not highly reliable (Sustainability Matters, 2018). Solar power stations are an uninterrupted energy source for this region because the infrastructure required for setting up the station is minimal compared to a diesel or a mains generating station.
The solar project is an excellent investment for Cape York’s communities because it does provide uninterrupted energy for several hours, even when there is no sunlight. These solar stations are considered remote as some areas are still inaccessible to them and always require large investments (Sajid, 2014).
Furthermore, solar panels and storage units can be re-engineered into a mobile solar supply . 研究essay代写
And increase their efficiency by 19% of their average capacity. (Trautz et al., 2013, p.535). The project proposes a mobile solar supply that is movable to any part of the Cape York Peninsula. Therefore more households will have access to power.
The Lakeland storage and solar project is an excellent example of solar energy in this region being commissioned in 2016, with around 10.8 MW and 40000 solar panels (Parkinson, 2018). In this project, the research is based on a mobile solar power supply, which is robust to move to various locations and provide continuous energy to the community.
The proposed design is according to the EWB design considerations (Engineers Without Borders Challenge, 2020). The whole power station is designed on a 4×4 truck and is required to have 3-10 kWh capacity per day. The mobile solar supply would be beneficial for the rangers as it would be accessible to any terrain and provide sufficient energy according to their needs (EWB Challenge 2020).
Therefore, this report illustrates the performance criteria for project. In this the various parameters of design are considered. The design option discusses possible solutions for the mobile solar power supply. Here the various designs are weighed against each and their design parameters discussed. There after the best design solution is discussed with all its design solutions.
The significant problems of the design are then discussed. The problems range from design issues and on site problems that are likely to take place on site. The suggested solutions for the problem are then discussed and remedies for the problems sort. Conclusions are then drawn from this report.
1.2 Scope: 研究essay代写
This report will discuss many factors regarding a prototype that relies on a mobile solar power solution to produce energy that can be used by ranger groups traveling throughout the country. Reliability, longevity, maintenance, environmental maintenance, transportability, and cost performance criteria will be discussed to determine the introduced project’s effectiveness.
We aim to achieve the power needs of the ranger groups to obtain a safe and independent power source through their travels in the country. The power needs will be achieved by discussing an available method that is efficient and does not negatively affect the environment.
1.3 Report Outline
In this report, section 2 will cover the project criteria. Under this, it will cover reliability, maintenance, sustainability, transport, and then cost. These criteria are assessed on a metric basis. The metrics of comparison are presented in tabular form. Section 3 will then cover the conclusion of the project and deductions arising from the analysis of the project.
Problem definition 研究essay代写
Power issues have dominated most parts of Cape York. The community has heavily relied on diesel power sources, which is not adequate for them. They, therefore, need a power source that is reliable, sustainable, and is transported efficiently. Therefore, the report discusses a four-wheel-drive trailer that is mobile and hence supplies to various parts of Cape York. Reaching as many areas as possible. The supply expected out of this system is 3-10 kWh per day.
2 Performance criteria
2.1 Reliability 研究essay代写
This criterion is a significant consideration to the prototype development, as it reveals the precision and warranty of the solar panel product. Solar panels have a warranty of 25 years (Asif, Singh and Alapatt, 2015). Clients require products with many years of warranty to be safeguarded from an unprecedented break down on their panels.
It is the guaranteeing of the product in terms of lasting, operating, performing, and functioning. Therefore, the prototype will be measured on the comprehensive warranty by years (Trautz et al., 2013, p.537). The more years of the warranty the system has, the higher the scope it receives.
A score of 1 describes that the component will be having a warranty of the material up to 12 months, where the 2nd score or number 2 will illustrate the standard level of a solar supply product from 1-3 years. The score of 3 is revealing an acceptable level of warranty, which could be 4-6 years. The last score, which achieves the highest level of all scoring, 4, is a satisfactory standard, which is ten years of warranty.
Table 1: Showing scores and warranty measure 研究essay代写
| Score | Measuring |
| 1 | Product Warranty6-12 months |
| 2 | Product Warranty 1-3 years |
| 3 | Product Warranty 4-6 years |
| 4 | Product warranty over 10 years |
2.2 Life span of the product 研究essay代写
In many remote places, electricity can cut out for a very long time. Thus there will be no power. This is based on the various power needs at different times. It is essential to ensure that power is available during different periods for various needs. This means that power should be available continuously for a given period.
Solar panels have a long life without experiencing breakdowns. The range is from a span of 1-2 years for substandard panels to a range of over 10 for super standard goods. The longer the system’s life span the better for the project since it reduces on cost. A system with a larger life span is also likely to be more expensive.
Table 2: Showing Life Span of the proposed system 研究essay代写
| Score | Level | The life span of the system |
| 1 | substandard | 1-2 years |
| 2 | standard | 2-4 years |
| 3 | acceptable | 4-6 years |
| 4 | satisfactory | >6 years |
2.3 Corrective Maintenance (20%) 研究essay代写
The amount of work and money that will be spent on maintaining the project is measured. This is a solar-powered project, which means it restrains power from a natural source; thus, it will not need as much maintenance as a traditional source project. For example, solar panels will require inspection and cleaning as a part of their periodic maintenance.
The average cost of maintenance is between $409 to $955, which will vary depending on the panels’ used materials (Fixr, 2020). The project can offer an uninterruptible power supply. The prototypes will have different materials used, boxes of the power supply, suspension systems, bearing, front, and rear lights qualities. Therefore, one of the determining factors of making the prototype is choosing the best qualities to have less periodic maintenance.
With score 1, the substandard level describes that the prototype project will have periodic maintenance every three months. The standard level will have regular maintenance every six months, which is normal for most solar-powered projects and has a score of 2. Score 3, has periodic maintenance every 12 months. Lastly, the satisfactory level shows an excellent measurement with routine maintenance every two years.
Table 3: Scores of Reliability 研究essay代写
| Score | Level | Measuring |
| 1 | Unreliable | Periodic maintenance every three months |
| 2 | Slightly reliable | Periodic maintenance every six months |
| 3 | Reliable | Periodic maintenance every 12 months |
| 4 | Satisfactory | Periodic maintenance every 24 months |
2.4 Sustainability (20%) 研究essay代写
The essential part of the solar panels is how they are eco-friendly compared to the old fashion generators currently in use in Cape York. The solution to this project is the use of solar panels. They have high efficiency and also reduce the emission of greenhouse gases. Furthermore, solar panels’ impact in the long term compared to fossil fuel is almost 0% on the environment and ozone hole. Also, solar panels’ use reduces the amount of wood that has been cut to produce heat for either home or energy.
Another benefit of solar panels is that it reduces carbon monoxide that harms our environment and has adverse effects on humans by causing asthma for humans. It is quite essential to maintain the sustainability of energy production while keeping a green environment (Geoscience Australia and BREE, 2014). A green source of energy leads to a cleaner environment which is healthier and safer. In this study, environmental sustainability will be measured on the basis of greenhouse gases emitted.
The scoring scale is 1 to 5 for this criterion; it goes from low sustainable to highly sustainable. The measurements depend on the type of material used for the project, for example, alloys and electric components. These measurements will be deduced for an extended period of time from 5 to 10 years to get the best result.
The levels are from inefficient to highly efficient where inefficient; the product will produce 4% of greenhouse gases. The acceptable level is 3% of greenhouse gases. From the third level to the fifth, the project will be good on the number of gases that will be produced where the polluting level will be from 2% to 0%. Measurement will be done by assessing the environmental impact of the source.
Table 4: Efficiencies of solar systems 研究essay代写
| SCORE | LEVEL | MEASURING |
| 1 | Inefficient | The product produces 4% of greenhouse gases. |
| 2 | Acceptable | The product produces 3% of greenhouse gases. |
| 3 | Generally Efficient | The product produces 2% of greenhouse gases. |
| 4 | Efficient | The product produces 1% of greenhouse gases. |
| 5 | Highly Efficient | The product produces 0% of greenhouse gases. |
2.5 Transport (20%) 研究essay代写
Transport is a critical factor that needs to be considered. The solar panels may be attached to a trailer or a robot. For this project, a trailer is suggested for use. A trailer will help reduce the amount of effort required to move the solar panel from one place to another because it is hardy. A waterproof box will cover the batteries and the electrical components.
The panels will be above the trailer to get the most possible amount of sunlight to produce electricity. The trailer will have the option to be dragged by either a car or truck. Transportability should be analyzed based on whether the adopted suites all of the terrains given some routes may be rugged. Thus, the adoption will be measured by drive train design. Despite the challenges power needs to get even tot the interior parts of Cape York. Hence the transport solution needs to be one that meets the desired results.
For this criterion, the scoring is from 1 to 3, with the score varying from poor to excellent. Based on the nature of the drive train. Some drive trains are able to move on a smooth terrain only; thus, they are rated as fixed drive trains while others are hardy enough to adapt to the rough terrain. These are rated as Flex heavy-duty drive train.
Table 5: Measure of sustainability 研究essay代写
| SCORE | LEVEL | MEASURING |
| 1 | Poor | Fixed drive train. |
| 2 | Acceptable | Flexible drive train. |
| 3 | Excellent | Flex heavy-duty drive train. |
2.6 Cost (15%) 研究essay代写
It is essential to define the cost criterion for this project. This project aims to supply remote areas with power using low-cost methods, materials, and design. Thus, the cost of the project should be reasonably low, as the client requested. To determine the cost of this project, assumptions have been made on the average amount of money needed to install a solar power system.
The average is $18000, which can supply a 250 square foot home with 6KW of power (Fixr, 2020). Cost of the project is a variable factor that needs to be considered to ensure the needs of all market players are met. An expensive project could be one that costs above $19000, a moderate one costs between $17,000 and$19,000 and a project can be said to be desirable if it costs less than $17,000.
Table 6: Measure of cost 研究essay代写
| SCORE | LEVEL | MEASURING |
| 1 | expensive |
>$19,000 |
| 2 | Moderate | $17,000 < x < $19,000 |
| 3 | Desirable |
<$17,000 |
Conclusion 研究essay代写
The report analysis the energy needs of Cape York. The Peninsula is currently facing an energy shortfall. Cape York is presently relying on diesel and the main generating station for its energy needs. These energy sources have not been reliable with many lacking access to power. Therefore, the solar power station solution would be an appropriate alternative for power (Geoscience Australia and BREE, 2014). The report proposes a mobile solar power station that is pulled by a trailer.
The report goes further to analyze the performance criteria for the portable solar power station. The performance criterion is analyzed under six factors. That is the reliability of the system under which the product’s warranty and precision will be examined (Sajid, 2014). The second criterion is the longevity of the product. Where the sustainability of power and its availability is checked. The third criterion is maintenance. In this case, the design consideration is whether the power source will be reliable enough based on maintenance needs.
The fourth criterion is analyzing the sustainability of the power source. 研究essay代写
Under this, the project is analyzed and checked if it is eco-friendly compared to the old fashioned generators that are currently in use in Cape York. The fifth criterion is transported. Since the solar system is mobile, it is prudent to understand its movement in different terrains to ensure that the power source can reach even the areas’ remotest (Sustainability Matters, 2018). Consequently, serving Cape York effectively.
The final criterion for consideration is cost. There is a need to analyze the system’s cost to ensure it remains within a reasonable value. Moreover, there is a need to ensure that the system offers a Return on Investment (ROI). In these considerations, the viability of each consideration is checked while at the same time looking at available options. This is assessed in table form, with each criterion having considerations that need to be looked into to see whether they are viable
References 研究essay代写
Asif, A., Singh, R. and Alapatt, G., 2015. Technical and economic assessment of perovskite solar cells for large scale manufacturing. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 7(4), p.043120.
Engineers Without Borders (EWB) 2020, ‘Design Area Four Energy’, viewed 14 September 2020, <https://ewb.box.com/shared/static/zsiwyigjvriocibkhrw20zc1iwfo4pnv.pdf>.
Fixr 2020, Solar panel maintenance cost, viewed 14 September 2020, <https://www.fixr.com/costs/solar-panel-maintenance>.
Geoscience Australia and BREE, 2014, Australian Energy Resource Assessment, 2nd edn. Geoscience Australia, Canberra, viewed 10 September 2020, <https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/08/australian-energy-resource-assessment.pdf>.
Parkinson, G 2018, Lyon, Jera, plan to start on Cape York solar + battery project in early 2019, Renew Economy, viewed 14 September 2020, <https://reneweconomy.com.au/lyon-jera-plan-to-start-on-cape-york-solar-battery-project-in-early-2019/>.
Sajid, Z., 2014. Energy in Australia – Peak Oil, Solar Power, and Asia’s Economic Growth: A Review. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2.
Sustainability Matters 2018, ‘Large-scale solar and storage project provides power to Cape York’, Sustainability Matters, 21 February, viewed 12 September 2020, <https://www.sustainabilitymatters.net.au/content/energy/news/large-scale-solar-and-storage-project-provides-power-to-cape-york-387581568>.
Trautz, K, Jenkins, P, Walters, R, Scheiman, D, Hoheisel, R, Tatavarti, R, Chan, R, Miyamoto, H, Adams, J, Elarde, V & Grimsley, J 2013, ‘IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics’, Mobile solar power, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 535-541, viewed 12 September 2020, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260578261_Mobile_Solar_Power/stats>.
太阳能项目
用你的名字
课程代码
教授的名字
大学
市，州
日期
表中的内容：
1.引言 …………………………………………………………………………… 3
1.1背景资料 …………………………………………………………… 3
1.2范围 ……………………………………………………………4
1.3问题定义…………………………………………………………… 4
2.性能指标…………………………………………………………………. 5
2.1可靠性…………………………………………………………………. 5
2.2长寿…………………………………………………………………. 6
2.3维护………………………………………………………………………… 7
2.4可持续发展…………………………………………………………………………8
2.5运输…………………………………………………………………………… 10
2.6费用…………………………………………………………………………… 11
3.结论…………………………………………………………………………….. 12
4.参考文献…………………………………………………………………………….. 13
表1：显示分数和保修措施2
表2：显示拟议系统的寿命3
表3：可靠性分数3
表4：太阳能系统的效率4
表5：可持续性衡量5
表6：成本计量6
介绍
1.1背景资料
由于二十世纪的技术进步以及全球巨大的能源需求，世界各地的能源行业正在蓬勃发展。它导致了对绿色能源的需求。约克角是澳大利亚最偏远的半岛之一，位于昆士兰州的最北端。由于其地理位置的原因，该半岛正遭受能源短缺的困扰（澳大利亚地球科学和BREE 2014；可持续发展问题2018）。由于人口和季节的变化，约克角不同地区的能源需求也有所不同。该地区的大多数社区都位于国家电网的边缘，因此电力传输不是高度可靠（可持续性事项，2018年）。太阳能电站是该地区不间断的能源，因为与柴油或主发电站相比，建立电站所需的基础设施最少。
对于约克角的社区来说，太阳能项目是一项了不起的投资，因为即使在没有阳光的情况下，它也可以连续提供数小时的能源。这些太阳能站被认为是偏远的，因为它们仍然无法到达某些地区，并且总是需要大量投资（Sajid，2014）。此外，可以将太阳能电池板和存储单元重新设计为移动式太阳能电源，并将其效率提高至平均容量的19％。 （Trautz等人，2013年，第535页）。该项目提出了一个可移动的太阳能电源，该电源可以移动到约克角半岛的任何部分。因此，更多的家庭将有电。
莱克兰储能和太阳能项目是该地区2016年投入使用的太阳能的一个很好的例子，约有10.8兆瓦和40000块太阳能电池板（Parkinson，2018）。在该项目中，研究基于移动式太阳能电源，该电源能够移动到各个位置并为社区提供持续的能源。拟议的设计是根据EWB的设计考虑（工程师无国界挑战组织，2020年）。整个电站设计为4×4卡车，每天的发电量要求为3-10 kWh。移动太阳能供应对护林员将是有益的，因为它可以在任何地形上使用，并根据他们的需求提供足够的能量（EWB挑战2020）。
因此，此报告说明了项目的绩效标准。在此考虑了各种设计参数。设计选项讨论了移动太阳能电源的可能解决方案。在这里，各种设计都针对每种设计进行权衡，并讨论了它们的设计参数。之后，将讨论最佳设计解决方案及其所有设计解决方案。然后讨论了设计中的重大问题。问题包括可能在现场发生的设计问题和现场问题。然后讨论针对该问题的建议解决方案，并针对该问题进行补救。然后从本报告中得出结论。
2绩效标准
2.1可靠性
该标准是原型开发的重要考虑因素，因为它揭示了太阳能电池板产品的精度和保修。太阳能电池板的保修期为25年（Asif，Singh和Alapatt，2015年）。客户要求对具有多年保修期的产品进行保护，以防止面板发生前所未有的故障。这是产品经久耐用，运行，性能和功能的保证。因此，原型将根据全面保修的年限进行衡量（Trautz等人，2013年，第537页）。系统的保修期越长，其接受的范围就越大。
得分为1表示该组件将对材料提供长达12个月的保修，其中得分为2或数字2表示该组件在1-3年内的标准水平。 3分表示可接受的保修水平，可能为4-6年。最后一个得分达到所有得分最高的分数4，这是一个令人满意的标准，它具有十年的保修期。
1.2范围
本报告将讨论有关原型的许多因素，原型依赖于移动太阳能发电解决方案来产生能量，供全国各地的护林员团体使用。将讨论可靠性，寿命，维护，环境维护，可运输性和成本绩效标准，以确定引入的项目的有效性。我们旨在满足护林员部队的电力需求，以通过他们在该国的旅行获得安全独立的动力源。通过讨论一种有效且不会对环境造成负面影响的可用方法，可以满足电源需求。
1.3报告大纲
在本报告中，第2节将介绍项目标准。在此之下，它将涵盖可靠性，维护，可持续性，运输以及成本。这些标准以度量为基础进行评估。比较指标以表格形式显示。然后，第3节将介绍项目的结论以及从项目分析中得出的扣除额。
1.1问题定义
电力问题已在约克角大部分地区占据主导地位。社区严重依赖柴油动力，这对他们来说是不够的。因此，他们需要可靠，可持续且能有效运输的电源。因此，该报告讨论了一种四轮驱动的拖车，该拖车是可移动的，因此可以供应约克角的各个部分。到达尽可能多的区域。预计该系统每天的供电量为3-10 kWh。
表1：显示分数和保修措施
2.2产品寿命
在许多偏远地区，电力可能会中断很长时间。 因此，将没有权力。 这基于在不同时间的各种电源需求。 重要的是要确保在不同时期可以满足各种需求。 这意味着在给定时间段内应连续可用电源。 太阳能电池板寿命长，不会发生故障。 范围从次标准面板的1-2年到超标准商品的10倍以上。 系统的寿命越长，对项目越有利，因为它可以降低成本。 使用寿命更长的系统也可能会更昂贵。
表2：显示拟议系统的寿命
| 分数 | 等级 | 系统的寿命 |
| 1 | 不合格 | 1-2 年 |
| 2 | 标准 | 2-4 年 |
| 3 | 不错 | 4-6 年 |
| 4 | 很好 | >6 年 |
2.3纠正性维护（20％）
测量将在维护项目上花费的工作量和金钱。这是一个太阳能发电项目，这意味着它会限制自然资源的发电。因此，它不需要像传统源项目那样多的维护。例如，太阳能电池板将需要作为定期维护的一部分进行检查和清洁。维护的平均成本在409美元至955美元之间，具体取决于面板使用的材料（Fixr，2020年）。该项目可以提供不间断电源。原型将使用不同的材料，电源盒，悬挂系统，轴承，前灯和尾灯质量。因此，制造原型的决定因素之一是选择最佳质量以减少定期维护。
不合格等级为1分，说明原型项目每三个月进行一次定期维护。标准级别每六个月定期进行维护，这对于大多数太阳能项目来说是正常的，得分为2。得分3，每12个月进行定期维护。最后，令人满意的水平表明每两年进行一次例行维护即可得到很好的测量结果。
表3：可靠性分数
| 分数 | 等级 | 测量 |
| 1 | Unreliable | 每三个月定期维护 |
| 2 | Slightly reliable | 每六个月定期维护 |
| 3 | Reliable | 每12个月定期维护 |
| 4 | Satisfactory | 每24个月定期维护 |
2.4可持续性（20％）
与目前在约克角使用的老式发电机相比，太阳能电池板的重要组成部分是如何做到环保。该项目的解决方案是使用太阳能电池板。它们具有很高的效率，还减少了温室气体的排放。此外，与化石燃料相比，太阳能电池板的长期影响对环境和臭氧空洞的影响几乎为0％。另外，太阳能电池板的使用减少了砍伐的木材以产生热量以供家庭或能源使用。太阳能电池板的另一个好处是，它可以减少危害我们环境的一氧化碳，并通过引起人类哮喘而对人类产生不利影响。在保持绿色环境的同时保持能源生产的可持续性是非常重要的（澳大利亚地球科学和BREE，2014）。绿色能源可带来更清洁，更健康，更安全的环境。在这项研究中，将基于所排放的温室气体来衡量环境的可持续性。
该标准的评分等级为1到5；它从低可持续性发展到高度可持续性。测量取决于项目所用材料的类型，例如合金和电气组件。这些测量将在5到10年的较长时间内推算得出最佳结果。级别从低效率到低效率的高效率；该产品将产生4％的温室气体。可接受的水平是温室气体的3％。从第三级到第五级，该项目将在污染水平为2％到0％的情况下生产将要产生的气体数量。将通过评估污染源的环境影响来进行测量。
表4：太阳能系统的效率
| 分数 | 等级 | 测量 |
| 1 | Inefficient | 该产品产生4％的温室气体。 |
| 2 | Acceptable | 该产品产生3％的温室气体。 |
| 3 | Generally Efficient | 该产品产生2％的温室气体。 |
| 4 | Efficient | 该产品产生1％的温室气体。 |
| 5 | Highly Efficient | 该产品产生0％的温室气体。 |
2.5运输（20％）
运输是需要考虑的关键因素。太阳能电池板可以连接到拖车或机器人上。对于此项目，建议使用拖车。拖车会帮助您减少将太阳能电池板从一个地方移到另一个地方所需的工作量，因为它很坚固。防水盒将盖住电池和电气组件。面板将在拖车上方，以获取尽可能多的阳光来发电。拖车可以选择由汽车或卡车拖动。应根据在某些路线下所采用的所有地形是否崎不平来分析运输能力。因此，采用率将通过传动系统设计来衡量。尽管面临挑战，但动力仍需抵制约克角的内部。因此，运输解决方案需要是一种能够满足期望结果的解决方案。
对于此标准，得分为1到3，得分从差到好。基于动力传动系统的性质。一些动力传动系统只能在平坦的地形上行驶；因此，它们被评为固定动力传动系统，而其他则足够坚固以适应崎terrain的地形。这些被评为Flex重型传动系统。
表5：可持续性衡量
| 分数 | 等级 | 测量 |
| 1 | Poor | 固定传动系 |
| 2 | Acceptable | 灵活的传动系统 |
| 3 | Excellent | Flex重型传动系统 |
2.6成本（15％）
定义该项目的成本标准至关重要。 该项目旨在使用低成本的方法，材料和设计为偏远地区供电。 因此，应客户要求，该项目的成本应相当低。 为了确定该项目的成本，已对安装太阳能系统所需的平均金额进行了假设。 平均价格为18000美元，可以为250平方英尺的房屋提供6KW的电力（Fixr，2020年）。 项目成本是一个可变因素，需要考虑以确保满足所有市场参与者的需求。 一个昂贵的项目可能是一个成本高于19000美元的项目，一个适中的项目在17000美元至19000美元之间，如果成本低于17000美元，则可以说是一个理想的项目。
表6：成本计量
| SCORE | LEVEL | MEASURING |
| 1 | expensive | >$19,000 |
| 2 | Moderate | $17,000 < x < $19,000 |
| 3 | Desirable | <$17,000 |
结论
该报告分析了约克角的能源需求。半岛目前面临能源短缺。约克角目前依靠柴油和主要的发电站来满足能源需求。这些能源并不可靠，因为许多人无法获得电力。因此，太阳能电站解决方案将是电力的合适替代方案（澳大利亚澳大利亚地球科学公司和BREE，2014年）。该报告提出了一种由拖车拉动的移动式太阳能发电站。该报告进一步分析了便携式太阳能发电站的性能标准。在六个因素下分析了性能标准。这就是系统的可靠性，将在该系统下检查产品的保修和精度（Sajid，2014年）。第二个标准是产品的寿命。在哪里检查电源的可持续性及其可用性。第三个标准是维护。在这种情况下，设计考虑因素是根据维护需求电源是否足够可靠。
第四个标准是分析电源的可持续性。在这种情况下，与约克角目前使用的老式发电机相比，该项目将进行分析和检查，是否对环境友好。第五标准被运输。由于太阳能系统是可移动的，因此应谨慎了解其在不同地形中的移动，以确保电源甚至可以到达最远的区域（可持续发展事项，2018年）。因此，有效地服务于约克角。最终考虑的标准是成本。需要分析系统的成本，以确保其成本保持在合理的范围内。此外，需要确保系统提供投资回报率（ROI）。在这些考虑中，在考虑可用选项的同时检查了每个考虑的可行性。这是以表格形式进行评估的，每个标准都需要考虑一些考虑因素，以查看它们是否可行。
References
Asif, A., Singh, R. and Alapatt, G., 2015. Technical and economic assessment of perovskite solar cells for large scale manufacturing. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 7(4), p.043120.
Engineers Without Borders (EWB) 2020, ‘Design Area Four Energy’, viewed 14 September 2020, <https://ewb.box.com/shared/static/zsiwyigjvriocibkhrw20zc1iwfo4pnv.pdf>.
Fixr 2020, Solar panel maintenance cost, viewed 14 September 2020, <https://www.fixr.com/costs/solar-panel-maintenance>.
Geoscience Australia and BREE, 2014, Australian Energy Resource Assessment, 2nd edn. Geoscience Australia, Canberra, viewed 10 September 2020, <https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/08/australian-energy-resource-assessment.pdf>.
Parkinson, G 2018, Lyon, Jera, plan to start on Cape York solar + battery project in early 2019, Renew Economy, viewed 14 September 2020, <https://reneweconomy.com.au/lyon-jera-plan-to-start-on-cape-york-solar-battery-project-in-early-2019/>.
Sajid, Z., 2014. Energy in Australia – Peak Oil, Solar Power, and Asia’s Economic Growth: A Review. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2.
Sustainability Matters 2018, ‘Large-scale solar and storage project provides power to Cape York’, Sustainability Matters, 21 February, viewed 12 September 2020, <https://www.sustainabilitymatters.net.au/content/energy/news/large-scale-solar-and-storage-project-provides-power-to-cape-york-387581568>.
Trautz, K, Jenkins, P, Walters, R, Scheiman, D, Hoheisel, R, Tatavarti, R, Chan, R, Miyamoto, H, Adams, J, Elarde, V & Grimsley, J 2013, ‘IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics’, Mobile solar power, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 535-541, viewed 12 September 2020, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260578261_Mobile_Solar_Power/stats>.
