Ethics, Logics, and Capital Punishment

Name

Institution

Ethics, Logics, and Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment代写 Ethical Issues Regarding Death Penalty:The death penalty is against human dignity and the fundamental right to life.

 

How Social Media is Pushing the Limits of Legal Ethics

It is a concern that even jurors cannot be able to abstain from the use of social media at work to acceptable levels (Harris, 2011). The use of social media affects the entire legal process from juror tweeting to judges post in Facebooks which expose their potential biases.

Ethical Issues Regarding Death Penalty  Capital Punishment代写

Capital Punishment代写
Capital Punishment代写

All human beings have rights to live regardless of their status in the society even the criminals. The death penalty is against human dignity and the fundamental right to life. Death penalty subject the victim to torture which is inhumane and immoral thus against human rights. It has also been argued that because of mistakes in the justice system some innocent people end up being executed which not only legally wrong but also morally wrong (Blumenson, 2007). However, there are those of the opinion to support the death penalty. They argue that if a person takes another person’s right to life through murder, then the question is: why should that person have the right to life if he/she deprived another person’s right to life?

Capital Punishment and Its Implementation in the U.S  Capital Punishment代写

Capital punishment is legal in the U.S. however, implementation of the law varies from state to state. States have different criminal laws which determine whether to uphold the death penalty or replace it with imprisonment without parole. States also have the discretion to abolish or retain the law on capital punishment. Therefore, its implementation varies from one state to another.

Capital Punishment and Fallacy of “Two Wrongs Make a Right”

In the making of a policy three elements were considered which include ideology, empirical, and ethical. The fallacy of “two wrongs make a right” should not hold in the execution of criminals as they have right to live. Killing a person because of committing murder is illogical and immoral instead other available punishments should be used.

Efficacy of Capital Punishment  Capital Punishment代写

Moreover, the death penalty is considered counterproductive considering the moral message it carries, and because through execution, it legitimizes the very immorality (killing) it seeks to remedy. As such, it undermines the legitimacy and moral authority of the criminal justice system. Additionally, death penalty is neither proven that it reduce the number is murder cases nor the use of alternative punishment has increased the number of murder cases.

The Best Rational Argument in Support of Capital Punishment Capital Punishment代写

The most logical reason is that the death penalty should be used retribution for murder and thus morally right.

How the Pros of Capital Punishment Overcome the Logical Fallacy of “two wrongs makes right.”  

The single most advantage of a capital sentence is that the decision is made following the due process for the conviction of the suspect. The fallacy does not follow the legal process and therefore not recognized in the criminal justice system.

Capital Punishment代写
Capital Punishment代写

References

Blumenson, E. (2007). Killing in Good Conscience: What’s Wrong with Sunstein and Vermeule’s Lesser Evil Argument for Capital Punishment and Other Human Rights Violations?. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 210-238.

Harris, C. (2011). How Social Media Is Pushing the Limits of Legal Ethics. Retrieved from https://gigaom.com/2011/02/26/how-social-media-is-pushing-the-limits-of-legal-ethics/

 

更多其他:Case study代写 Essay代写 Proposal代写 文学论文代写 Academic代写 研究论文代写 艾莎代写 Report代写 Admission Review代写

合作平台:天才代写 幽灵代写  写手招聘

 
QQ在线咨询
售前咨询热线
QQ:3554475127
售后咨询热线
QQ:3042439236